Sunday, October 26, 2008

Election Generalities

I sit here this morning less than two weeks away from the next presidential election. Since I last expounded on the subject, we've seen more debates, new campaign strategies, and perhaps the best political SNL impression in the show's history. At this point, I'd just like to give my general impression of the goings-on in this race.

On one side, we have John McCain. Senator McCain wants me to identify with a tax-dodging plumber from the upper Midwest. It seems he follows president Bush's economic philosophy; mainly, that by spending money on an ever-growing military budget and off the wall mandated programs, then giving massive tax breaks to everyone from large corporations to the lowest of tax brackets, he'll somehow magically create a boom in the job market. Meanwhile, his VP nominee displays basically zero knowledge of foreign policy issues beyond the "Go, America, Go!" attitude that seems to... *ahem* "excite the Republican base." All the while she's running up a bill for clothes that exceeds my lifetime income to date.

Then, on the other side, we have Barack Obama. Senator Obama is a typical Democrat, economically at least. His grand plan is to get my vote by promising to implement more expensive social programs than his elaborate tax plan can possibly pay for. He's going to subsidize everything from healthcare, to college loans, to environmentally sound industry.

I suppose, in this economic respect, this is a typical election, in that both parties want to spend more money than they can afford to fund their parties pet projects.

Personal attacks have taken on an interesting character in this election as well. Obama and Palin are both getting cries of inexperience from the other side. McCain has been decried as out of touch with everyday Americans. The interesting ones, though, come directed at Obama from that excited Republican base (and their fear-mongering FOX news/ talk radio pundits). There is, of course, the accusation that he's a Muslim, which, while being completely false, I somewhat resent. The idea that being a Muslim would make someone unqualified to be president is ridiculous. These are often accompanied by accusations of ties to al-Qaeda. Then there are the assumptions (fueled by the McCain campaign) that '60s anti-war terrorist Bill Ayers is his closest adviser; the two served together on an education reform committee in Chicago and are friends, but Ayers does not work for the Obama campaign. Similar false accusations were made about failed executives from Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. The silliest ones seem to be about Obama's race. Apparently there's a rumor going around that Obama isn't actually African American, that he's 1/4 black and 1/2 Middle Eastern (again, the implication that an Arab American is automatically unqualified to be president is disgusting), and is only trying to court the black vote. This, of course, is easily debunked. Obama's ethnicity is a matter of public record, plus, he has been very forthcoming about his family history.

Is my bias showing yet? I guess my point is that there are a lot of reasons to dislike both these guys without making stuff up. Hate them for who they are, not for the names their opponents call them.

BUT! I, again, chose optimism! How can we go wrong, America, in an election year where EVERYBODY's the change candidate? At the time of this writing, we've only got 85 days left of George W. Bush, and that's something over 80% of us can celebrate!
Keep an eye on it! ------------------------>

As always, my dear silent and few readers, I'd be happy to discuss any of this further, but let's keep something straight... I consider my personal politics personal, and neither of these candidates represent them well, so this would be discussion for the sake of discussion. Politics is fun for me, and I'm a firm believer that we can agree to disagree, and still be friends at the end of the day.

In conclusion, boo Republicans for not supporting Ron Paul.

10 comments:

Jason Johnston said...

Haha, I would love to discuss politics with you. And I totally agree about discussing just for the sake of discussing. And this is from a libertarian who watches FOX News hahaha. Any chance you'll be able to make it to my recital?

Jason Johnston said...

Oh, and I DEFINITELY support your Ron Paul statement.

Jason Johnston said...

My recital will be on November 21 @ 8:00pm. I hope you can make it! But don't get fired over it haha.

bookmunkie said...

You mean boo everyone for not supporting Ron Paul

Anonymous said...

The funniest thing I've heard so far is McCain calling Obama a socialist by saying "he wants to spread the wealth". Isn't that a horrible idea?

Mr. Greene (and His Orchestra) said...

Well, to a certain extent I'd say it is. This is not a socialist country, after all. People are entitled to use their earnings as they please. But make no mistake; the idea that Obama's tax plan, which would raise taxes for high tax brackets, is going to usher in the end of capitalism is a blatant over-reaction. Remember, these are the same people and companies who had their taxes cut by president Bush. Also, I haven't really looked into it further, but the Obama campaign asserts that these taxes would still be lower than those during the Reagan administration. It's not so much a systemic change, as a return to old policies.

And yes, boo everyone for not supporting Ron Paul!

Jason Johnston said...

Concerning the whole socialist thing, it seems to me that just about every 30-40 years there's this debate over democracy vs. some other form of gov't/philosophy. For example, McCarthy in the 60's and FDR in the 30's. Yet our country still goes on, and with it's representative democracy. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like these things are always cyclical. I think I good way to sum up Obama's economic plans are like this: capitalist with a splash of socialist philosophy hahaha. Just some food for though.

Mr. Greene (and His Orchestra) said...

I'd say you're exactly right. There is a left in the American political spectrum, and they often get their way. FDR was perhaps the most socialist president we've ever had, and he's regarded by most historians as one of the best. Also, it's not like he duped the public; he was reelected four times. When Americans get socialism, it's because we've voted for it, and it almost always results in a swing back to the right. Sometimes it takes a few decades (as was the case with the 20th Century), but it happens.

Unknown said...

There is absolutely no reason that a republican democracy can't also be socialist.

Socialism and totalitarianism are not the same thing. The former is an example of an economic system like capitalism, while the latter is a system of government, like a monarchy or a republic. There can be a co-existence of any economic system with any form of government.

Just thought I would put that out there in case anyone might be confused about this.

Also, if anyone isn't sure who the socialist candidate for president is, it's Brian Moore.

Jason Johnston said...

Hahaha, I did know that he was the Socialist candidate, thanks to the Colbert Report!